There must be a conspiracy in Christianity to cover up all the embarrassing discrepancies in the NT. The effort to elevate Jesus to a nearly sinless state is pathetic. The Christian clergy is doing a superb job in covering up anything that doesn’t look decent in the NT. That is the tradition initiated by the early church fathers when they were putting it together. Whoever wrote Peter’s letters made false statements to favor the Christian faith. For example,
1 Peter 2:21 (NIV) To this you were called, because Christ suffered for you, leaving you an example, that you should follow in his steps.
22 "He committed no sin, and no deceit was found in his mouth."
23 When they hurled their insults at him, he did not retaliate; when he suffered, he made no threats. Instead, he entrusted himself to him who judges justly.
Peter is misquoting the Tanakh saying that Christ did not sin so the Christian should follow in his footsteps. A closer analysis of Jesus’ life reveals plenty of glitches that would convict him on several counts in any court of law. Jesus was put together in writing many years after the facts so it was easy to blend fact and fiction about him. Christians believe almost anything. Take this,
John 18:33 (NIV) Pilate then went back inside the palace, summoned Jesus and asked him, "Are you the king of the Jews?"
34 "Is that your own idea," Jesus asked, "or did others talk to you about me?"
35 "Am I a Jew?" Pilate replied. "It was your people and your chief priests who handed you over to me. What is it you have done?"
36 Jesus said, "My kingdom is not of this world. If it were, my servants would fight to prevent my arrest by the Jews. But now my kingdom is from another place."
(See: Luke 23:3, Mark 15:2)
Matthew 27:11 (NIV) Meanwhile Jesus stood before the governor, and the governor asked him, "Are you the king of the Jews?" "Yes, it is as you say," Jesus replied.
12 When he was accused by the chief priests and the elders, he gave no answer.
13 Then Pilate asked him, "Don't you hear the testimony they are bringing against you?"
14 But Jesus made no reply, not even to a single charge--to the great amazement of the governor.
Compare Matthew’s “Jesus made no reply” to John’s Christ charging the Jews with his arrest. Someone is lying. Since NT was written many years after the facts most writers were not first hand witnesses of the events, either. So we do not know for sure how much in it is fact and how much is fantasy to favor the faith. So let’s see if Christ’s life is worth copying.
Peter says that, “When they hurled their insults at him, he did not retaliate;” but Peter is forgetting that Christ is unmatched taking the initiative of insulting the Jews. He even forgot that Jesus called him Satan in front of everybody!
Matthew 16:23 (NIV) Jesus turned and said to Peter, "Get behind me, Satan! You are a stumbling block to me; you do not have in mind the things of God, but the things of men."
Christ would spontaneously insult the Jews just for being Jews. He called his own blood relatives “snakes,” “brood of vipers,” “sons of the devil,” and so on. So in effect Peter is saying that it is OK to malign the Jews like Christ did to follow in the “footsteps of the master.” Christianity seems to pursue all the opposite of what Christ was doing. They are now “saving” the Jews from the sulfur and brimstone burning Goy Hell that Christ dared them to escape.
Christ was teaching that nobody should be angry with his/her brother and call him, “Raca” or “you fool.” Jesus was obviously an exemption to his own teaching. So if any Christian wants to follow “in the footsteps of the master” he/she must know how far behind to follow and what steps to skip. Christ said that…
Matthew 23:2 (NIV) "The teachers of the law and the Pharisees sit in Moses' seat.
3 So you must obey them and do everything they tell you. But do not do what they do, for they do not practice what they preach.
Surely Jesus didn’t call any of his brothers that he came to save, “Raca” or “you fool,” but he actually hurled them worse insults than that. So anyone “following in the footsteps of the master” is probably aware that hypocrisy is the rule #1 of the game. Jesus accused the Pharisees of the same hypocrisy he was committing. The early Christians were always very delighted by the insults that Jesus hurled at the Jews for being Jews. They never objected, not even today.
Matthew 5:22 (NIV) But I tell you that anyone who is angry with his brother will be subject to judgment. Again, anyone who says to his brother, `Raca,' is answerable to the Sanhedrin. But anyone who says, `You fool!' will be in danger of the fire of hell.
Matthew 23:33 (NIV) "You snakes! You brood of vipers! How will you escape being condemned to hell?
35 And so upon you will come all the righteous blood that has been shed on earth, from the blood of righteous Abel to the blood of Zechariah son of Berekiah, whom you murdered between the temple and the altar.
36 I tell you the truth, all this will come upon this generation.
John 8:44 (NIV) You belong to your father, the devil, and you want to carry out your father's desire. He was a murderer from the beginning, not holding to the truth, for there is no truth in him. When he lies, he speaks his native language, for he is a liar and the father of lies.
Revelation 21:8 (NIV) But the cowardly, the unbelieving, the vile, the murderers (i.e. the Jews), the sexually immoral, those who practice magic arts, the idolaters and all liars (i.e. the Jews, a.k.a. “sons of the Devil”) --their place will be in the fiery lake of burning sulfur. This is the second death."
Revelation 14:10 (NIV) he, too, will drink of the wine of God's fury, which has been poured full strength into the cup of his wrath. He will be tormented with burning sulfur in the presence of the holy angels and of the Lamb.
Hitler’s final solution was total riddance and destruction of the Jews, but Jesus (i.e. the Lamb)’s final solution is to make them suffer sizzling alive in a sulfur and brimstone Inferno forever so he and his “holy” ones can enjoy watching. Take your pick. The holocaust was hardly a picnic! Christ said that the sulfur burning Hell was created for the devil and his angels. He also said that the Jews are the children of the devil. So it is only natural that both should burn in the Goy Hell forever!
Peter says, “Christ didn’t retaliate” and “Christ entrusted himself to him who judges justly.” This is so inaccurate! Christ is on record doing all the judging! To some sinner Jews he forgave their sins on the spot, but to the Roman soldiers that were crucifying him he asked the “father” to forgive them. Is it jurisdiction or glitch? The inconsistency in the NT is breathtaking! The Jews are depicted as so dumb. They are quoted objecting Jesus’ forging the sins of a Jew saying that only Almighty Yahweh can forgive sins, but they are reported as not even blinking an eye when Christ damns them in judgment to a sulfur burning Hell. This is an obvious glitch that the writers of the NT slipped. No Christian ever objected, either.
When Peter says that, “when Christ suffered, he made no threats” he ignored that Jesus is telling the story of the rejected son and his (i.e. Jesus) revenge. The writers of the NT don’t keep track of what they write.
First, they tell you…
Matthew 21:37 (NIV) Last of all, he sent his son (i.e. Christ) to them. `They will respect my son,' he said.
38 "But when the tenants (i.e. the Jews) saw the son, they said to each other, `This is the heir. Come, let's kill him and take his inheritance.'
39 So they took him and threw him out of the vineyard and killed him.
Then, they tell you…
John 6:15 (NIV) Jesus, knowing that they (i.e. the Jews) intended to come and make him king by force, withdrew again to a mountain by himself.
Finally, they tell you…
Luke 19:27 (NIV) But those enemies of mine (i.e. the Jews) who did not want me to be king over them--bring them here and kill them in front of me.'"
So the Jews won’t only have their heads chopped off anyway by Jesus’ followers (i.e. the Christians) but the Jews will burn in sulfur and brimstone for all eternity for the pleasure of Christ (a.k.a. “the Savior”) and the Christians. Peter’s bit that, “Christ entrusted himself to him who judges justly” is not what Jesus was doing. Jesus stated that “all judgment” was given to him (contrary to Yahweh’s Word!)
John 5:22 (NIV) Moreover, the Father judges no one, but has entrusted all judgment to the Son,
Daniel 7:21 * As I watched, this horn (i.e. Christianity) was waging war against the saints (i.e. the Jews) and defeating them, (e.g. 6,000,000 of them in the holocaust alone and who knows how many more were killed by the Christian Crusaders, the Most Holy Inquisition, and so on!)
22 until the Ancient of Days (i.e. the Almighty Yahweh) came and pronounced judgment in favor of the saints of the Most High (i.e. the Jews), and the time came when they possessed the kingdom.
The final Judge is not Jesus Christ, but Almighty Yahweh and he is judging in favor of Israel! So it is possible that if “Jesus Christ” were a real Jew that he be saved anyway because Peter said that, “he entrusted himself to him who judges justly.” So let us not despair for the future. There is hope for everybody!
Hey! Old Shep, #7, Eliyah. et al them Christians, where are you???
1 Peter 2:21 (NIV) To this you were called, because Christ suffered for you, leaving you an example, that you should follow in his steps.
22 "He committed no sin, and no deceit was found in his mouth."
23 When they hurled their insults at him, he did not retaliate; when he suffered, he made no threats. Instead, he entrusted himself to him who judges justly.
Peter is misquoting the Tanakh saying that Christ did not sin so the Christian should follow in his footsteps. A closer analysis of Jesus’ life reveals plenty of glitches that would convict him on several counts in any court of law. Jesus was put together in writing many years after the facts so it was easy to blend fact and fiction about him. Christians believe almost anything. Take this,
John 18:33 (NIV) Pilate then went back inside the palace, summoned Jesus and asked him, "Are you the king of the Jews?"
34 "Is that your own idea," Jesus asked, "or did others talk to you about me?"
35 "Am I a Jew?" Pilate replied. "It was your people and your chief priests who handed you over to me. What is it you have done?"
36 Jesus said, "My kingdom is not of this world. If it were, my servants would fight to prevent my arrest by the Jews. But now my kingdom is from another place."
(See: Luke 23:3, Mark 15:2)
Matthew 27:11 (NIV) Meanwhile Jesus stood before the governor, and the governor asked him, "Are you the king of the Jews?" "Yes, it is as you say," Jesus replied.
12 When he was accused by the chief priests and the elders, he gave no answer.
13 Then Pilate asked him, "Don't you hear the testimony they are bringing against you?"
14 But Jesus made no reply, not even to a single charge--to the great amazement of the governor.
Compare Matthew’s “Jesus made no reply” to John’s Christ charging the Jews with his arrest. Someone is lying. Since NT was written many years after the facts most writers were not first hand witnesses of the events, either. So we do not know for sure how much in it is fact and how much is fantasy to favor the faith. So let’s see if Christ’s life is worth copying.
Peter says that, “When they hurled their insults at him, he did not retaliate;” but Peter is forgetting that Christ is unmatched taking the initiative of insulting the Jews. He even forgot that Jesus called him Satan in front of everybody!
Matthew 16:23 (NIV) Jesus turned and said to Peter, "Get behind me, Satan! You are a stumbling block to me; you do not have in mind the things of God, but the things of men."
Christ would spontaneously insult the Jews just for being Jews. He called his own blood relatives “snakes,” “brood of vipers,” “sons of the devil,” and so on. So in effect Peter is saying that it is OK to malign the Jews like Christ did to follow in the “footsteps of the master.” Christianity seems to pursue all the opposite of what Christ was doing. They are now “saving” the Jews from the sulfur and brimstone burning Goy Hell that Christ dared them to escape.
Christ was teaching that nobody should be angry with his/her brother and call him, “Raca” or “you fool.” Jesus was obviously an exemption to his own teaching. So if any Christian wants to follow “in the footsteps of the master” he/she must know how far behind to follow and what steps to skip. Christ said that…
Matthew 23:2 (NIV) "The teachers of the law and the Pharisees sit in Moses' seat.
3 So you must obey them and do everything they tell you. But do not do what they do, for they do not practice what they preach.
Surely Jesus didn’t call any of his brothers that he came to save, “Raca” or “you fool,” but he actually hurled them worse insults than that. So anyone “following in the footsteps of the master” is probably aware that hypocrisy is the rule #1 of the game. Jesus accused the Pharisees of the same hypocrisy he was committing. The early Christians were always very delighted by the insults that Jesus hurled at the Jews for being Jews. They never objected, not even today.
Matthew 5:22 (NIV) But I tell you that anyone who is angry with his brother will be subject to judgment. Again, anyone who says to his brother, `Raca,' is answerable to the Sanhedrin. But anyone who says, `You fool!' will be in danger of the fire of hell.
Matthew 23:33 (NIV) "You snakes! You brood of vipers! How will you escape being condemned to hell?
35 And so upon you will come all the righteous blood that has been shed on earth, from the blood of righteous Abel to the blood of Zechariah son of Berekiah, whom you murdered between the temple and the altar.
36 I tell you the truth, all this will come upon this generation.
John 8:44 (NIV) You belong to your father, the devil, and you want to carry out your father's desire. He was a murderer from the beginning, not holding to the truth, for there is no truth in him. When he lies, he speaks his native language, for he is a liar and the father of lies.
Revelation 21:8 (NIV) But the cowardly, the unbelieving, the vile, the murderers (i.e. the Jews), the sexually immoral, those who practice magic arts, the idolaters and all liars (i.e. the Jews, a.k.a. “sons of the Devil”) --their place will be in the fiery lake of burning sulfur. This is the second death."
Revelation 14:10 (NIV) he, too, will drink of the wine of God's fury, which has been poured full strength into the cup of his wrath. He will be tormented with burning sulfur in the presence of the holy angels and of the Lamb.
Hitler’s final solution was total riddance and destruction of the Jews, but Jesus (i.e. the Lamb)’s final solution is to make them suffer sizzling alive in a sulfur and brimstone Inferno forever so he and his “holy” ones can enjoy watching. Take your pick. The holocaust was hardly a picnic! Christ said that the sulfur burning Hell was created for the devil and his angels. He also said that the Jews are the children of the devil. So it is only natural that both should burn in the Goy Hell forever!
Peter says, “Christ didn’t retaliate” and “Christ entrusted himself to him who judges justly.” This is so inaccurate! Christ is on record doing all the judging! To some sinner Jews he forgave their sins on the spot, but to the Roman soldiers that were crucifying him he asked the “father” to forgive them. Is it jurisdiction or glitch? The inconsistency in the NT is breathtaking! The Jews are depicted as so dumb. They are quoted objecting Jesus’ forging the sins of a Jew saying that only Almighty Yahweh can forgive sins, but they are reported as not even blinking an eye when Christ damns them in judgment to a sulfur burning Hell. This is an obvious glitch that the writers of the NT slipped. No Christian ever objected, either.
When Peter says that, “when Christ suffered, he made no threats” he ignored that Jesus is telling the story of the rejected son and his (i.e. Jesus) revenge. The writers of the NT don’t keep track of what they write.
First, they tell you…
Matthew 21:37 (NIV) Last of all, he sent his son (i.e. Christ) to them. `They will respect my son,' he said.
38 "But when the tenants (i.e. the Jews) saw the son, they said to each other, `This is the heir. Come, let's kill him and take his inheritance.'
39 So they took him and threw him out of the vineyard and killed him.
Then, they tell you…
John 6:15 (NIV) Jesus, knowing that they (i.e. the Jews) intended to come and make him king by force, withdrew again to a mountain by himself.
Finally, they tell you…
Luke 19:27 (NIV) But those enemies of mine (i.e. the Jews) who did not want me to be king over them--bring them here and kill them in front of me.'"
So the Jews won’t only have their heads chopped off anyway by Jesus’ followers (i.e. the Christians) but the Jews will burn in sulfur and brimstone for all eternity for the pleasure of Christ (a.k.a. “the Savior”) and the Christians. Peter’s bit that, “Christ entrusted himself to him who judges justly” is not what Jesus was doing. Jesus stated that “all judgment” was given to him (contrary to Yahweh’s Word!)
John 5:22 (NIV) Moreover, the Father judges no one, but has entrusted all judgment to the Son,
Daniel 7:21 * As I watched, this horn (i.e. Christianity) was waging war against the saints (i.e. the Jews) and defeating them, (e.g. 6,000,000 of them in the holocaust alone and who knows how many more were killed by the Christian Crusaders, the Most Holy Inquisition, and so on!)
22 until the Ancient of Days (i.e. the Almighty Yahweh) came and pronounced judgment in favor of the saints of the Most High (i.e. the Jews), and the time came when they possessed the kingdom.
The final Judge is not Jesus Christ, but Almighty Yahweh and he is judging in favor of Israel! So it is possible that if “Jesus Christ” were a real Jew that he be saved anyway because Peter said that, “he entrusted himself to him who judges justly.” So let us not despair for the future. There is hope for everybody!
Hey! Old Shep, #7, Eliyah. et al them Christians, where are you???
Comment