Hi everyone,
Many people have said that Paul taught contrary to Torah.
Some who believe in Mashiach say that Paulos taught contrary to Mashiach as well.
I believe he did not.
However, i always had a question about circumcision.
I knew that the assembly(ekkleysia=church) of Jerusalem allowed that the gentiles not be circumcised of flesh.
However, that would still be going against Torah.
Then I concluded, how even Avraham himself was circumcised of heart first and THEN circumcised in flesh, that the gentile is the same.
And that the gentile is not required to be circumcised first to be saved as some of Pauls contemporary rivals taught.
However that Paulos taught that the gentile is saved first and that EVERYTHING else comes after.
Is this true or not?
If it is, somebody help me out with the fullness of scripture because i can only see it hinted in scripture so far.
shalom
Many people have said that Paul taught contrary to Torah.
Some who believe in Mashiach say that Paulos taught contrary to Mashiach as well.
I believe he did not.
However, i always had a question about circumcision.
I knew that the assembly(ekkleysia=church) of Jerusalem allowed that the gentiles not be circumcised of flesh.
However, that would still be going against Torah.
Then I concluded, how even Avraham himself was circumcised of heart first and THEN circumcised in flesh, that the gentile is the same.
And that the gentile is not required to be circumcised first to be saved as some of Pauls contemporary rivals taught.
However that Paulos taught that the gentile is saved first and that EVERYTHING else comes after.
Is this true or not?
If it is, somebody help me out with the fullness of scripture because i can only see it hinted in scripture so far.
shalom
Comment