When a crime has been committed and the guilty one apprehended - the jury has the prove a case BEYOND A REASONABLE DOUBT.... so a true and fair sentence can be given
the crime committed or not committed is the question~
the trial needs to begin~
When it comes to a self confessed apostle saul/paul.....a charge has been laid at his door!! namely posing as an apostle~ and preaching 'my gospel'
We need to set a crime scene and to view this crime to the point of satisfaction that establishes a crime - '' beyond a ''reasonable doubt'' with a testimony that contains the fruits of his ministry~~~~
or
that the ''Christian church'' he ''founded in Antioch, was built upon 'my gospel'' and array of his other personal thoughts that opposed THE DIVINE INSPIRATION of our Saviour.
shall we begin to discover this ''well hidden'' crime against '' the churched'' and their vulnerability of following a wolf in sheep's clothing~
exhibit #1
the true rendering of the term ''APOSTLE''
[is not one of private ''self confession'']
NO!
why not?
there was a CONDITION attached to this unique title - THIS IS STATED very clearly so no man can be ignorant of this fact~
NO one could claim this title who was not an eye witness to the daily events and ministry for 3 odd years walking and travelling with our Saviour~
this is very CLEARLY stated when the 11 apostles were choosing the new 12th apostle Mathias
the CONDITIONS WERE MET by this new 12th man~ therefore the POSTIONS OF the original eye witnesses and term ''APOSTLE'' was CLOSED forever.
whosoever states other wise is a liar and a peddler of untruth~
the crime committed or not committed is the question~
the trial needs to begin~
When it comes to a self confessed apostle saul/paul.....a charge has been laid at his door!! namely posing as an apostle~ and preaching 'my gospel'
We need to set a crime scene and to view this crime to the point of satisfaction that establishes a crime - '' beyond a ''reasonable doubt'' with a testimony that contains the fruits of his ministry~~~~
or
that the ''Christian church'' he ''founded in Antioch, was built upon 'my gospel'' and array of his other personal thoughts that opposed THE DIVINE INSPIRATION of our Saviour.
shall we begin to discover this ''well hidden'' crime against '' the churched'' and their vulnerability of following a wolf in sheep's clothing~
exhibit #1
the true rendering of the term ''APOSTLE''
[is not one of private ''self confession'']
NO!
why not?
there was a CONDITION attached to this unique title - THIS IS STATED very clearly so no man can be ignorant of this fact~
NO one could claim this title who was not an eye witness to the daily events and ministry for 3 odd years walking and travelling with our Saviour~
this is very CLEARLY stated when the 11 apostles were choosing the new 12th apostle Mathias
the CONDITIONS WERE MET by this new 12th man~ therefore the POSTIONS OF the original eye witnesses and term ''APOSTLE'' was CLOSED forever.
Acts 1, the 11 disciples asked the Holy Spirit to choose the 12th apostle to replace Judas who fell from his office by betrayal.
The disciples cast a lot, and Matthias was accepted as the choice of the Holy Spirit.
Their criteria was that the 12th apostle had to be someone with them from the beginning of Jesus' ministry and saw the resurrected Jesus and the Ascension.
By that criteria, Paul could never qualify.
This seals the question on whether Paul could be the 12th.
The disciples cast a lot, and Matthias was accepted as the choice of the Holy Spirit.
Their criteria was that the 12th apostle had to be someone with them from the beginning of Jesus' ministry and saw the resurrected Jesus and the Ascension.
By that criteria, Paul could never qualify.
This seals the question on whether Paul could be the 12th.
whosoever states other wise is a liar and a peddler of untruth~
Comment